Abstract
A correction module trained to refine diffusion predictions reduces exposure bias, improving unguided sample quality and enabling distillation to eliminate inference overhead.
Iterative sampling in diffusion models can lead to error accumulation due to exposure bias. The denoiser is trained on real images interpolated with noise, but at inference its inputs are constructed from its own imperfect predictions from the earlier steps, something it has never seen at training time. This might be one reason diffusion models often struggle without additional help, such as CFG. We introduce a correction step for diffusion models which attempts to reduce this training-inference gap. The corrector takes the base model's prediction as input and is trained against the same ground-truth target. This makes correction an explicit learning task, with training inputs provided by the base model. During sampling, at each denoising step, we iteratively refine the denoiser's clean-sample prediction. This allows us to correct predictions at intermediate denoising steps, preventing early artifacts from persisting into the final sample. Although the corrector is trained only on predictions from the base denoiser, it can be applied repeatedly to its own outputs at inference for better results. This simple framework leads to substantial improvement in sample quality while largely preserving diversity. We evaluate our method across DiT, SiT, and JiT. Our method substantially improves upon previously reported FID scores for unguided generation and, notably, unconditional generation, where producing high-quality samples without guidance has been particularly challenging. Our method achieves performance competitive with classifier-free guidance (CFG), and combining correction with CFG further improves diversity and reduces oversaturation typical of CFG. Finally, we show that the additional inference cost of correction can be amortized by distilling the refined predictions back into the base diffusion model, retaining the quality gains without additional inference-time overhead.
Community
✨Correction Training for Diffusion Models✨
Donghoon Ahn¹, Runqian Wang¹, Alexei A. Efros¹, Taesung Park², Yash Belhe²
¹ UC Berkeley ² Reve
Can diffusion models generate high-quality images without classifier-free guidance?
Yes!
We introduce correction training, a simple and effective method for improving diffusion sample quality. A corrector learns to refine the denoiser’s predictions toward the same clean target. Applying correction iteratively during sampling substantially improves quality while largely preserving diversity and avoiding strong oversaturation. Across DiT, SiT, and JiT, correction achieves FID scores competitive with or better than classifier-free guidance.
🎬 Visualization: https://x.com/donghoon_ahn/status/2110038016622493951
🌐 Project page: https://sunovivid.github.io/correction-training/
💻 Code and checkpoints: https://github.com/sunovivid/correction-training
Please Upvote⬆️ if you like it!
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Looped Diffusion Transformer (2026)
- Unlocking Few-Step Diffusion for Faithful Previews (2026)
- Clean Forcing: Drift-Resistant Autoregressive Video Diffusion with a Frozen Base (2026)
- Dino Forcing Flow Models: Do not denoise what you can predict (2026)
- Are We Overthinking One-Step Generation? (2026)
- Consistent Distribution Matching for Data-Free Diffusion Distillation (2026)
- Correcting Guided Diffusion Trajectories with Spectral Alignment (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610.14136 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper